| |
|
Ancestry Solutions'
Ancestral Collectives
|
 |
|
Matches 4,351 to 4,400 of 4,853
| # |
Notes |
Linked to |
| 4351 |
There are two Ruck individuals that appear in the very early Boughton under Blean parish registers:
1. Richard Ruck who is a parish churchwarden for several years beginning in 1562; and,
2. Joan Ruck who married in 1562.
For the time being I have assigned both of the above Ruck individuals to the first marriage John Ruck to Johan as that is the only place on the tree that they could fit and still be 21 in 1562.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
In an email received from Richard Farhall, Town Clerk of Rye, Sussex on 17 September 2002 he advised as follows:
"Richard Ruck was Mayor of Rye during the year of 1550 when he shared Mayoralty with George Raynoldes, and again in 1553. He had a son with the same name who never became Mayor but was a freeman of the town. There is no monument in the Town about him. However, Richard Ruck senior owned property at the end of Watchbell Street, down a small lane which is now called Watchbell Lane but originally half of it was called Ruck's Lane and this appears on Jeakes Map of 1667 which is reproduced in 'The Records of Rye Corporation'." [I strongly suspect that the group at Rye are descendants of the Ruck family of Hawkhurst.]
There was a Richard Ruck, son of Hugh Ruck, deceased, citizen and writer of the court letter of London [scrivener, 1532], 11 Jan. 1564/5. Source: The Common Paper: Subscriptions to the oath, 1417-1613, Scriveners' Company Common Paper 1357-1628: with a continuation to 1678 (1968), pp. 20-49. Accessed at: http://www.british-history.ac.uk/report.asp?compid=35896&strquery=ruck. Date accessed 19 November 2005. | RUCK, Richard (I5206)
|
| 4352 |
There are two Sara Bouthillier's that were christened at Caraquet within a short time of each other. The first is Sara Bouthillier the daughter of Edouard Bouthillier and Agathe Parise. She was christened 8 November 1828. The other Sara was christened as Marie Sara during November of 1829. The parents of this second Sara were Demier Bouthillier and Isabelle Genest [sic:Gionet].
According to the 1881 census of Caraquet (taken on 4 April of that year) Sara was 53 years old. This information would suggest that she was born between April 1828 and April 1829 which, in and of itself, tends to suggest that Sara was the daughter of Edouard Bouthillier and Agathe Parise. The information coming solely from the census calculation is not sufficient evidence to support the conclusion of parents, however, as errors in the reporting of ages was commonplace. Consequently other research has been undertaken to attempt to determine the correct parents of Sara Bouthillier.
The parish registers of Caraquet were searched for burials of one of these two Sara's up to the approximate time of marriage of either of them, that is to say, up to 1850. A burial of Sara as being the wife of Jean Gionet was also searched for during the period following April 4, 1881 to the end of the register at 1883. Unfortunately, burials which occurred after 1850 disappear from the registers which are currently on hand. So this method of research has failed to produce any additional helpful information, such as the age at which Sara died.
The marriage of Jean Gionet and Sara Bouthillier has also been researched. In order to determine a likely year of marriage for Jean Gionet and Sara Bouthillier the Caraquet register was searched for the earliest recorded christening of one of their children. That event occurred on 9 March 1848 with the birth of Marthe, a daughter. Godparents were Nazaire Lanteigne and Christine Gionet. The second child born was Magdeline Gionais who was christened on 31 March 1850. Godparents Raphael Albert and Odile Gionnais. Both of these christenings indicate that the child concerned was of the "legitimate marriage" of Jean Gionet and Sarah Bouthillier. Despite being able to narrow down a marriage date for Jean Gionet and Sara Bouthillier to approximately 1846 or 1847, unfortunately the register of Caraquet is lacking marriages for that time period. In fact the register is lacking all marriages between 1843 and 1848. This last mentioned fact also makes it impossible to quickly determine if the second Sara (Marie Sara) ever married. The promises of marriage contracted during the period 1843 to 1848 are included in the Caraquet register, although sporadically, and should be examined more closely.
Next to be considered were the godparents who were present at the christening of Narcisse Gionet. Those sponsors were Gervais Moorai and Archange Cormier. Similarly, the godparents on christenings of any other children of Jean Gionet and Sara Bouthillier should be sought out, for it may be that the only certain method by which to identify the correct Sara Bouthillier will be to trace the parentage of the various godparents.
Lastly, the marriage record of Narcisse Gionet and Marie Lanteigne indicates that they possessed a dual consanguineous relationship to each other - one of three to the fourth degree, and the other, of the fourth to the fourth degree. This indicates that Narcisse Gionet and Marie Lanteigne shared at least one common great-grandparent as well as at least one common great-great-grandparent. If an examination of the godparents present at the christening of Jean Gionet and Sara Bouthillier's children fails to produce conclusive evidence of Sara's own origins, then the only remaining method for such determination will come via a thorough research into the lineage of both Narcisse Gionet and his wife, Marie Lanteigne.
For the interim, however, the parents of Sara Bouthillier have been shown as Damien Bouthillier and Isabelle Gionet. | BOUTHILLIER, Sara (I1360)
|
| 4353 |
There are two Sara Bouthillier's that were christened at Caraquet within a short time of each other. The first is Sara Bouthillier the daughter of Edouard Bouthillier and Agathe Parise. She was christened 8 November 1828. The other Sara was christened as Marie Sara during November of 1829. The parents of this second Sara were Demier Bouthillier and Isabelle Genest [sic:Gionet].
According to the 1881 census of Caraquet (taken on 4 April of that year) Sara was 53 years old. This information would suggest that she was born between April 1828 and April 1829 which, in and of itself, tends to suggest that Sara was the daughter of Edouard Bouthillier and Agathe Parise. The information coming solely from the census calculation is not sufficient evidence to support the conclusion of parents, however, as errors in the reporting of ages was commonplace. Consequently other research has been undertaken to attempt to determine the correct parents of Sara Bouthillier.
The parish registers of Caraquet were searched for burials of one of these two Sara's up to the approximate time of marriage of either of them, that is to say, up to 1850. A burial of Sara as being the wife of Jean Gionet was also searched for during the period following April 4, 1881 to the end of the register at 1883. Unfortunately, burials which occurred after 1850 disappear from the registers which are currently on hand. So this method of research has failed to produce any additional helpful information, such as the age at which Sara died.
The marriage of Jean Gionet and Sara Bouthillier has also been researched. In order to determine a likely year of marriage for Jean Gionet and Sara Bouthillier the Caraquet register was searched for the earliest recorded christening of one of their children. That event occurred on 9 March 1848 with the birth of Marthe, a daughter. Godparents were Nazaire Lanteigne and Christine Gionet. The second child born was Magdeline Gionais who was christened on 31 March 1850. Godparents Raphael Albert and Odile Gionnais. Both of these christenings indicate that the child concerned was of the "legitimate marriage" of Jean Gionet and Sarah Bouthillier. Despite being able to narrow down a marriage date for Jean Gionet and Sara Bouthillier to approximately 1846 or 1847, unfortunately the register of Caraquet is lacking marriages for that time period. In fact the register is lacking all marriages between 1843 and 1848. This last mentioned fact also makes it impossible to quickly determine if the second Sara (Marie Sara) ever married. The promises of marriage contracted during the period 1843 to 1848 are included in the Caraquet register, although sporadically, and should be examined more closely.
Next to be considered were the godparents who were present at the christening of Narcisse Gionet. Those sponsors were Gervais Moorai and Archange Cormier. Similarly, the godparents on christenings of any other children of Jean Gionet and Sara Bouthillier should be sought out, for it may be that the only certain method by which to identify the correct Sara Bouthillier will be to trace the parentage of the various godparents.
Lastly, the marriage record of Narcisse Gionet and Marie Lanteigne indicates that they possessed a dual consanguineous relationship to each other - one of three to the fourth degree, and the other, of the fourth to the fourth degree. This indicates that Narcisse Gionet and Marie Lanteigne shared at least one common great-grandparent as well as at least one common great-great-grandparent. If an examination of the godparents present at the christening of Jean Gionet and Sara Bouthillier's children fails to produce conclusive evidence of Sara's own origins, then the only remaining method for such determination will come via a thorough research into the lineage of both Narcisse Gionet and his wife, Marie Lanteigne.
For the interim, however, the parents of Sara Bouthillier have been shown as Damien Bouthillier and Isabelle Gionet. | BOUTHILLIER, Sara (I133)
|
| 4354 |
At least one living or private individual is linked to this note - Details withheld. | Living (I17668)
|
| 4355 |
There is a birth registered at the Partridge Union Chapel at Faversham that spells the mother's maiden surname as Massea, which would imply that her name was MASSEY. There is a christening of a Sarah MASSEY at Teynham to John and Mary MASSEY on 29 Jan 1809. | MERCER, Sarah (I6422)
|
| 4356 |
There is a burial of a Mary Smith at Lifton on 12 Jun 1810. There is no description with the entry so it is impossible to determine if it relates to this Mary Smith.
There is another baptism of a Mary Smith at Lifton in 1815 Unfortunately, the Bishop's Transcript for 1815 is in such terrible shape that it is impossible to find this baptism. I will have to check it in the Parish Register at some point in time. | SMITH, Mary (I17208)
|
| 4357 |
There is a discrepancy in marriage particulars for this couple.
The original marriage is alleged to have occurred on 1 May 1886 at Union, Salt Lake, Utah. However, note also the following details for what appears to be a second marriage of the same couple.
Details For Marriage ID#204755 :
25 Nov 1891at Manti, Sanpete County, Utah, U.S.A.
Groom Last Name: GREGORY Groom First Name: William (31) Groom Residence: Union Fort Bride Last Name: SPILLETT Bride First Name: Alice (21) Bride Residence: Union Fort Place: Manti Date: 25 Nov 1891 County of Record: Sanpete State: Utah Volume: 2 Page: 147 | Family (F1605)
|
| 4358 |
There is a discrepancy regarding the alleged second marriage of George Ruck to Mary Denne. On the one hand the parish register entry of the marriage records the groom as George BUCK. However, the transcript of the marriage licence records the groom as George RUCK. What is needed is an examination of the original licence. However, I am given to understand that once the marriage licences were printed the originals were destroyed to save space at Canterbury. The allegation may be in existance. | RUCK, George (I5765)
|
| 4359 |
There is a James Hill who is in residence of house and garden of Bradford manor during the tithe apportionment of August 1838. Could this be our missing link? Nothing is known of this fellow or what became of him. | HILL, James (I7001)
|
| 4360 |
There is a marriage in the G.R.O. index which may relate to this Lydia Elinor Dimond, but there is no indication that any of the Dimond family members left the London area. Nevertheless, the marriage particulars are included here: marriage December Quarter, 1907, Swansea District, vol 11a, page 1810. The potential spouses are Rudy Alfred ANTILA or Amaziah Owen JOHN. | DIMOND, Lydia Elinor (I1128)
|
| 4361 |
There is a married at Highampton Nov 30 1740 William Davy and Joan Doble by John Rouse, Rector.
Interestingly, a William Davy certifies that Elizabeth Doble christened 1734 at Beaworthy, the daughter of Joan Northcote and Philip Doble had been resident at Beaworthy for 4 weeks prior to the marriage in 1755. John Rouse was also Rector of Beaworthy. Further Philip Doble was buried 28 Nov 1736, exactly 2 years before the above noted marriage. So, I have to wonder if the Joan Doble, the bride in the marriage at Highampton is my Joan Northcote the widow of Philip Doble.
These events at Beaworthy are possibly related:
Davy William c 30 Jan 1737/8 William/Jone
Davy John Norham c 18 Apr 1736 William/Jone*
*This baptism indicates that the William Davy christened in 1737/8 may belong to William/Jone Davy of the baptism in 1736 as Susanna Doble the daughter of Philip and Joan Doble was baptised the same year in September.
Davy Joan dbl 28 Jan 1758/9
Davy William dbl 24 Jun 1759
There was a William davy widower buried at Beaworthy on 20 Jan 1789.
Northcott
Devon & Cornwall. Common in Tudor Devon. Several back to 1238 but also several, separate, places called Northcott, (e.g. in Axminster, Witheridge & North Tawton) for them to originate from..
John Northcott senior, freeholder at Hatherleigh 1733 from QS7/14, Devon Freeholders Book, 1733
QUARTER SESSIONS BUNDLES: 1747: MIDSUMMER: PRESENTMENTS AND IND#CTMENTS, Midsummer 1747
Repository
Devon Heritage Centre
Reference number
QS/4/1747/MIDSUMMER/PR/13
Description
Presentment against William Northcott of Beaworthy husbandman for assault and battery on William Woolridge, taking one Richard Northcott, then and yet an apprentice to William Woolridge, out of his possession and custody. True bill
Date
Midsummer 1747
Extent
1m
Access status
Open
Northcott Margaret c 22 Mar 1712/13 d/o Richard/Margaret
Northcott Joane c 4 May 1681 d/o John/Grace
Northcott John May Grace m 26 Apr 1680 | NORTHCOTE, Joane (I21)
|
| 4362 |
There is a memorial headstone as follows:
Bessie Shugg (Battin)
Born: 1870
Died: 1939
Arnold Shugg
Born: 1873
Died: 1956
Cemetery
Fernwood Cemetery
6203 U.S. 13
Lansdowne, Delaware, Pennsylvania
United States | BATTIN, Bessie (I973)
|
| 4363 |
There is a Phillip son of Thomas and Sarah Rowlett baptised at St. Martin on 15 May 1675
Catharine d/o Thomas/Sarah Roulett baptised 11 Feb 1683.
Mary d/o Thomas/Mary Roulett baptised 17 Dec 1677 | ROWLETT, Thomas (I13797)
|
| 4364 |
There is also a burial of a John Prebble on 23 Feb 1783 at St. Mary Northgate. In the absence of a distinguishing feature it is impossible to determine at this stage which burial relates to father or son. | PREBBELL, John (I2564)
|
| 4365 |
There is also a burial of a John Prebble on 29 Apr 1762 at St. Mary Northgate. In the absence of a distinguishing feature it is impossible to determine at this stage which burial relates to father or son. | PREBBLE, John (I12241)
|
| 4366 |
There is an inconsistency between the age at death recorded on the death registration index and the age at burial recorded in the burial register. Age at death on civil registration is stated to be 79 years while the age on burial is state to be 84 years. Age on the 1871 census is recorded as 83 years. These latter ages would put John's birth year circa 1787. It is highly possible that John was in fact born several years before his baptism. | HARRIS, John (I587)
|
| 4367 |
There is no additional information on the marriage entry in the PR | Family (F5505)
|
| 4368 |
There is no indication with this burial that it pertains to this Mary Harris. | ELLIS, Mary (I11674)
|
| 4369 |
There was a mechanic named Mathew Barre, whose wife, by whom he had children, at one time washed the linen of the family of Cromwell, wherein dwelt Ralph Sadler, a man of some note, and now a member of Queen Elizabeth's Council. This Matthew went abroad, I know not from what cause, unless as some thought he suspected the chastity of his wife, and therefore he went away that he might not be compelled to witness that which he could neither endure nor prevent. When he had been gone some years, his wife, either hearing or pretending that he was dead, married Sir Ralph Sadler. Matthew at length returned, and when he found that his wife had married another, he re-claimed her. Sadler on the other hand, who had children by her, would not give her up. The matter was therefore referred to the highest tribunal, i. e. to the parliaments of the realm, as well under King Henry as under King Edward. It was there decreed that this woman, who was first married to Matthew and then to Sadler, and had had children by both, was, from thenceforth, to be deemed not the wife of Matthew the first husband, but of Sadler, he being the more powerful and rich; and therefore against the truth of the Gospel, the wife of the first husband, still alive, was adjudged to the second husband.”
“He left me two years after the birth of our daughters he tarried at cards living riotously and consuming his time unthriftily at unlawful games and never applying himself to his labour and handycraft, for the maintenance of his one wife and children's sustenance, I didst advertise him diverse times and reverently declared unto him, my husband the punishment and plague of God that hung over such as would not apply themselves to labour in their vocation, and exhorting him to live as become an honest poor man. Well, he did without my consent and knowledge suddenly depart from me, and, albeit becometh no christen man to give his Christian brother or sister occasion to fall into the wrath and displeasure of Almighty God, much less the husband his wyfe or the wyfe her husband whom God by his holy ordinance and godly institution of two fleshes hath made one, either to other to be a comfort and aid, to procreate children to God's glory and the increase of the Common Wealth, and to avoid fornication. He not having in memory or at the least not regarding this holy Sacrament, his duty to God, nor the faith and promise that he had made to his wyfe, but led with the spirit of the devil, did not only depart, but being departed from me, did not send any knowledge of his state, saving one time, a quarter of a year after his departure.”
He wandered from town to town, and continued in no place certain by the space of three years, and then came at length to Cardyffe in Wales, where remaining but one year he then departed into Ireland, and there was half a year.
“I was left in the most extreme poverty, lusty of bodie and young in years, so that, if God had not had the more favour to me, like enough it had been that I might have been enticed to lewdness. Howbeit I in the meantime, considering my duty to God, and the promise that I and my husband did make either to other, did not only behave myself very honestly and virtuously in labouring for my living, for the avoidance of sin, but also, as became a faithful wife, did make diligent search and manifold inquisition of the state of my husband, first remaining twelvemonth at Dunmow, where we were married, and then declaring my miserable and pitiful state to divers of my friends. One affirmed that he heard it said that Matthew, my husband, was dead. He advised and counselled me too become a nun; whereupon I, by their suite, was brought to the nunnery in Clerkenwell beside London, and there being not only in service but also in favour with the Prioress then being, a woman of gravity and wisdom, by reason that she behaved her self very honestly, I did upon my pitiful case and desire that I might have been a nun, the Prioress declaring unto me the state of religion how that it was not prepared nor ordained for young persons such as were like to procreate children, and meet to live abroad in the world, but for aged people; in no-wise would consent thereto, but councilled and exhorted me not to forsake the world, alledging that if I did continue in my honest behaviour I might, with God's grace, be matched with some honest person, in matrimony; and would have then preferred me to an honest service in the City of London: but I, regarding my faith given to my husband, and desirous to be ascertained first of his life or death, procuring divers of my friends living in London which knew my husband, who by reason of their sciences and occupations had occasion yearly to resort to the notable faires kept in the most part of the country, to make diligent search for Mathew, I departed thence to Sevenoaks in Kent, where, as I said, Mathew was borne, and where Richard Barre and Peter Barr, his bretheren, and diverse other of his kinsfolks dwelled. I tarried the space of one year with Richard Barre and Peter Barr, who in the mean time, at my request, did not only go but also sent to diverse places to inquire of their brother but could have no manner of knowledge of him. Whereupon I repaired to the nunnery again, and there continuing a certain space, a man of Sarnm describing to me and my friends diverse notable tokens and signs of my husband, declaring also his name and occupation, affirmed certainly that he was dead. Whereupon I was after by the Prioresse prefered to the service of one Mrs. Prior, mother-in-law to the Lord Cromwell, Earle of Essex, in whose family I met my husband.”
I was a young man, desirous to lead in this world a life acceptable unto God, and perciveing the honest behaviour and virtuous qualities of Elene, for those causes only desired to be joined in matrimony with her; and after long suite not concealing nor dissembling any part of her state from me, but fully confessing and opening the circumstances of all her living from her childhood, at length, which was about four years after the departure of her husband, and eleven years past and more, I married her, and having continued as man and wyfe unto this present time, unto whom she during all the tyme of eleven years hath not only behaved her self obediently, reverently, and faithfully, as becometh an honest woman to her husband, but also hath wisely disposed and ordered my house, and all things thereunto belonging, as appertaineth to a wife and sage matron, and besides hath brought me forth nine children, whereof two be dead and seven be yet living, that is to say, Thomas Sadler, Edward Sadler, Henry Sadler, Ann Sadler, Mary Sadler, Jane Sadler, and Dorothy Sadler, and those hath brought up in the fear and love of God, like a virtuous Mother.
Mathew, within two years after the marriage had between myself and Elene had knowledge thereof, and hath been diverse times since at London, whereas he might have so opened the matter that might have come to our ears, yet as he himself confesseth he never sent unto her, nor disclosed that he was her husband till within four years last past, first as he saith declaring the same to her uncle John Mitchell of London, who now is dead, which by my wife’s troth never to come to her knowledge; and another time to Griffith, the king’s servant, now dwelling at the sign of The Bell and Sarazen's Head, by Fenchurch in London, who when he saw him, as Mathew sayeth, wondered, and said that one told him that he saw him buried; and the third time within this twelve month: whereupon Mathew was apprehended and brought to Lord Wriothesley, in whose house, for I was at that time and long since occupied in affairs in the borders adjoining unto Scotland, Mathew Barre hath been hitherto kept to the intent the whole truth might be perfectly examined. And for as much as it appeareth to be no feined thing, but that Mathew was married to Elene, as is aforesaid, whereby the said marriage had between your said Counseillour and her, by the Ecclesiastical laws, cannot be good and of force, and so by the Common laws of your Realm the said children begotten between your said counseillour and the said Elene should be taken for bastards, yet because it is manifest that the second marriage was only had through the evil behaviour and lewd demeanour of Mathew, and that I did the same, with a good and pure conscience, thinking that Mathew Barre be dead.
I maketh most humble petition unto your most godly Majesty, that it may please the same that it may be enacted, ordeyned, and established by your most royall Majestie, with the consent of the Lords Spiritual and Temporall, and of the Commons in this present Parliament assembled, and by the authority of the same, that the saide Thomas Sadler, Edward Sadler, Henry Sadler, Anne Sadler, Mary Sadler, Jane Sadler, and Dorothy Sadler, and every of them, shall at all times hereafter for ever be had, reputed, taken, esteemed and adjudged legitimate and lawful children begotten of the body of ye said Ralph Sadler, and shall be inheritable as well to the same Ralph Sadler as to all and singular his ancestors, and to all other person and persons, and every of them, to be inheritable to other in like manner, form, and condition, to all intents, constructions, and purposes, as they had been ingendered, begotten, and borne, in lawfull, perfect, and indissolvable matrimony ; and as if the said Elene had never been married to any other than only to the said Ralfe ; and as though the said Elene had been lawfully married, in perfect and indissolvable marriage, to the said Ralph ; and as though the said Mathew and Elene had never entermarried, or contracted any matrimony together, any law, statute, act, ordinance, constitution, canon, decree, custom, use, or any other thing or matter whatsoever to the contrary in anywise notwithstanding.
:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
It was believed that Margaret had either been married or affianced to a Mr. Barre, whom she believed to be dead at the time she married Ralfe Sadleir; but Mr. Barre returned home after a long absence abroad, and Sir Ralph was obliged to obtain a private Act of Parliament in 1546, in order to legitimatize his children, as noted in the above petition. | MITCHELL, Margaret Elene (I10303)
|
| 4370 |
There was no issue from this marriage to Richard Austin. | CARTER, Catherine (I7313)
|
| 4371 |
There were significant links missing out of Theaustralian.com.au article and perhaps even a misapplication of one of those listed. A more complete track back, beginning with Richard of Conisburgh, Duke of Cambridge runs something like the below list of ancestor. However, many sources from the Dark Ages are disputed or unclear, so it is not possible to make any absolute statements.
Richard of Conisburgh, Earl of Cambridge - son of
Isabella Perez of Castille - daughter of
Maria Juana de Padilla - daughter of
Maria Fernandez de Henestrosa - daughter of
Aldonza Ramirez de Cifontes - daughter of
Aldonza Gonsalez Giron - daughter of
Sancha Rodriguez de Lara - daughter of
Rodrigo Rodriguez de Lara - son of
Sancha Alfonsez, Infanta of Castile - daughter of
Zaida (aka Isabella) - daughter of
Al-Mu'tamid ibn Abbad, King of Seville - son of
Abbad II al-Mu'tadid, King of Seville - son of
Abu al-Qasim Muhammad ibn Abbad, King of Seville - son of
Ismail ibn Qarais - son of
Qarais ibn Abbad - son of
Abbad ibn Amr - son of
Amr ibn Aslan - son of
Aslan ibn Amr - son of
Amr ibn Itlaf - son of
Itlaf ibn Na'im - son of
Na'im II al-Lakhmi - son of
Na'im al-Lakhmi - son of
Zahra bint Husayn - daughter of
Husayn ibn Hasan - son of
Hasan ibn Ali - son of
Fatima - daughter of
Muhammad (pbuh)
There is a great deal of confusion, and thus suspicion, that Zaida was NOT the daughter of Al-Mu'tamid ibn Abbad, King of Seville but instead was his daughter-in-law. If this is fact, then the entire pedigree from Zaida back to Mohammad collapses and is of no consequence. Two sources are available that focus on this specific question: 1) Montaner Frutos, Alberto (2005). "La mora Zaida, entre historia y leyenda (con una reflexión sobre la técnica historiográfica alfonsí)". Historicist Essays on Hispano-Medieval Narrative. In Memory of Roger M. Walker (in Spanish). London: Maney Publishing for the MHRA (Publications of the Modern Humanities Research Association, 16. pp. 272–352. ISBN 1-904350-31-3; and, 2) Salazar y Acha, Jaime de (2007). "De nuevo sobre la mora Zaida". Hidalguía. La revista de genealogía, nobleza y armas (in Spanish). Madrid: Asociación de hidalgos de fuero de España (321, March–April). ISBN 9788495215291. ISSN 0018-1285. Myself, I have no opinion one way or the other, other than to label it a suspicious pedigree at the point of Zaida.
The key connections are these:
In 1023, Abu al-Qasim Muhammad ibn Abbad became the ruler of Seville in al-Andalus. He was formerly a qadi (judge) appointed by the Caliph of Cordoba, but seized power and formed his own dynasty, the Abbadids. He was a descendant of Muhammad through his daughter Fatima and grandson Hasan ibn Ali.
In 1091 the Almoravids from Morocco invaded Muslim Spain, and his grandson Al-Mu'tamid ibn Abbad lost his throne. His daughter Zaida fled north and took refuge at the court of King Alfonso VI of Leon. She became his mistress - the king was already married, but his wife was bedridden with illness. Zaida later converted to Christianity, took the baptismal name Isabella and - once the king's previous wife died - married him, bearing him three children that we know of.
In 1352 Maria de Padilla, a descendant of Zaida and Alfonso, became the mistress of King Peter 'the Cruel' of Castille. They had four children - two of the daughters married sons of King Edward III of England. It is from Isabella of Castille and Edmund, Duke of York that the current Queen of the UK is descended. | Aldonza Ramirez (I16158)
|
| 4372 |
There's a bit of info out there about Francis Weaver and his family. I think I have this down correctly, it's been a while since I've looked at this material...
Francis Weaver, UEL, b. New York State ca. 1758, served as a private in Butler’s Rangers in George Dame’s Company. Described as a “carpenter” and “farmer.” Was one of the signatories of the subscription list for the 1st church in St. Catharines, Feb. 1796. Served as a private in the 1st Regiment of Lincoln Militia in Jones’ Company in 1812. Was on a list of infirm men, who were unable to serve, in Sept. 1812. Died from illness on Nov. 15, 1814. Wife was named in the widows and orphans pension list, printed in the Niagara Spectator newspaper in 1817. Weaver was married to Elizabeth Alcombrack (aka Akenpach, Archenbaugh, Arkenbrack), the daughter of Peter Alcombrach, UEL. Francis and Elizabeth had three children born before 1789, and a grand total of 10 children: Peter, Jeremiah, John, Catherine, Baltus, Maria, Jacob, Adam, Hannah, Eliza who married a Secord. See Upper Canada Land Petitions W1/15 (1795) and W2/37 (1796.)
Their son Baltus (Battus) Weaver, b. Grantham, Sept. 7, 1790. Wife named Elizabeth. Baltus served in Jones’ Company in the 1st Lincoln Militia in 1812. Was paroled at the Battle of Fort George, May 1813. Petitioned for land as an SUE, and O.C. issued on May 17, 1820. Upper Canada Land Petition W12/211 (1816.)
His son, Henry B. Weaver, b. St. Catharines, 1836. Married to Elsie M. [Bile?] (b. 1846) in Oneida Township Aug. 27, 1864. Lived in Ancaster in 1871, named there in the census for that year. Moved to Marshall, Calhoun Co., Michigan, named there in the US census of 1880. Had seven children: Ellen (1865), William H (1867), Francis B (1870), Cordelia (1872), Elsie (1874), Robert (1876), Josiah (1878), the last three born in Michigan.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | WEAVER, George (I10339)
|
| 4373 |
At least one living or private individual is linked to this note - Details withheld. | Living (I1)
|
| 4374 |
They appeared to have had at least six children per baptismal records and census returns. Elizabeth’s ancestry is summarised in a separate section below. They were in Taunton throughout their lives:
o Anna Mary LANE (1832). Not on 1841 census, so presumed to have died young;
o Walter William LANE (aka William Walter LANE, 1835 Taunton -1907 Bristol) my 2xGGF. His separate story is below;
o Jane Maria LANE (1836-40);
o Mary LANE (1838-1931 Taunton). In 1841 she is recorded with member of the LOCK family. She married Edwin John Beaton SULLY (1832-85) in 1858 Taunton and continued to live in the town;
o John LANE (c1843 Taunton – after 1901). His separate story is below;
o Charles LANE (1848 Taunton - 1899 King's Norton, Birmingham). Charles was an Ironmonger's clerk in 1871 Bedminster (Bristol) and was shortly afterwards involved in the iron trade (as a commercial traveller) based in Birmingham. In 1875 Birmingham, he married Sarah Ann HALEY. The couple were childless and lived in Edgbaston until their deaths; | LOCK, Elizabeth (I16239)
|
| 4375 |
They of Wye | Family (F3227)
|
| 4376 |
They were granted a Papal Dispensation for being related in the 3rd and 4th degrees of kindred.[1][2][3]
1. Douglas Richardson. Magna Carta Ancestry: A Study in Colonial and Medieval Families, Genealogical Publishing Company, Jul 30, 2005.
2. Douglas Richardson. Magna Carta Ancestry: A Study in Colonial and Medieval Families, 2nd Edition, Vol. II.
3. Douglas Richardson. Plantagenet Ancestry: A Study In Colonial and Medieval Families, Genealogical Publishing Com, Jun 30, 2004. | Family (F6142)
|
| 4377 |
They were the parents of at least 6 sons and 8 daughters. | PORDAGE, Susan (I18892)
|
| 4378 |
Third son.
This information taken from the Original Visitation of Cornwall 1620, Harl. MS 1162, signed Daniell Searell. The Parish Registers of Antony prior to 1673 have been lost, and the only entry of the name from that date to the end of the century is the burial of Edward Searle on the 26 August, 1683. | SEARLE, Eugenius (I15008)
|
| 4379 |
Third son. | A’DENNE, John (I13095)
|
| 4380 |
Third wife. | APULDERFIELD, Agnes (I9278)
|
| 4381 |
This baptism was found in the Lifton Bishops Transcripts online at FamilySearch.org, image 173 of 257. Entry states that Mary was the daughter of William and Elizabeth Ellis of Souton. | ELLIS, Mary (I17205)
|
| 4382 |
This birth is registered under the surname spelling of McILONEY.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
McALONEY, Malcolm- Cobourg Union Cemetery, Northumberland County, Hamilton Township, LSGS-019
found on OFCA cemetery search
transcribed by
Lakeshore Genealogical Society P.O. Box 1222, Cobourg, Ont. K9A 5C4
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Two huge ferries connected Cobourg with the booming City of Rochester, New York State, on the south shore of the Lake and, if visitors were lucky, there might even be two vessels in the harbour at the same time. The ferries were more than pleasure vessels, for they carried goods, merchandise and vehicles back and forth in a constant exchange of commerce. They also brought an annual influx of wealthy American families who owned large homes in and around Cobourg and shared in the life of the town for the season. They brought their own culture and, by all accounts, mixed exceptionally well with the natives, providing seasonal work for domestic servants, gardeners and artisans to keep their mansions in good repair.
Ferries #1 and #2 served Rochester, New York; Cobourg and other Lake ports during 23 October 1915.
The harbour area had other activities going on beside those on the eastern quay. The centre pier at the water front had capacity to berth large lake vessels and was equipped with oil pipe lines to connect oil tankers for unloading fuel to the tank farm occupying land east of Hibernia Street and on which today the condominium complexes known as Victoria Gardens and Harbour Walk stand.
At the east corner of the harbour and south end of Division Street, a large coal shed stood with coal ready for transportation inland by rail. The railway spur line from the main CP and CN lines ran south in the centre of Spring Street, crossed King and veered off Hibernia, cutting south east at an angle to the harbour. Needless to say, trains had the right of way on Spring, and crossing King and on Hibernia Street. Until well into the 20th Century, horse-drawn wagons, traps and coaches wisely gave way to trains moving to and from the harbour.
Ferries that ploughed between Rochester, NY, Cobourg and other Lake Ontario ports carried on a thriving business transporting cargo, vehicles and passenger traffic. What with the passenger service, fuel oil, coal and industrial equipment moving in and out of Cobourg, the harbour was a place of constant activity. By the last quarter of the century, the harbour traffic and industry had diminished to a trickle. Ferries ceased serving the port, oil tankers and ocean-going vessels the served industry in town and the community came to an end. By the late 1970s the transformation of the harbour to accommodate small craft was complete.
Source: http://www.achart.ca/publications/cobourg.htm | MCALONEY, Malcolm (I11012)
|
| 4383 |
This birth is registered under the surname spelling of McILONEY.
Found on GRO website:
Birth Registration
MCILONEY, ADELAIDE MCCALL
GRO Reference: 1900 J Quarter in BOLTON Volume 08C Page 512 | MCALONEY, Adelaide (I11011)
|
| 4384 |
This birth registration states that the parents are not married and further that "Parents consent to enter the father's name into the file". Albert Gregory was present at the birth of Wilfred George.
Canada, Voters Lists
1949
Mr. Wilfred George Gregory, assistant manager, 88 Glendonwynne Road
Mrs. Wilfred George Gregory, 88 Glendonwynne Road | BOWLES-GREGORY, Wilfred George (I13721)
|
| 4385 |
This child is added here in speculation as her descendant, Joan Blanch and I share fairly strong DNA. Some of that DNA may also have come through Cluness. | PETRIE, Marion (I17022)
|
| 4386 |
This child is listed but then crossed out. Also, there are 5 children as having been born to the mother, 4 living and 1 deceased. This is likely the deceased child. | SMITH, Stanley Arthur (I14348)
|
| 4387 |
This child is not mentioned in the Will of John Roome, the elder of April 1635 as being one of the grandchildren. Therefore, she must have predeceased that John Roome. Her burial was eventually discovered at Hawkinge.
The Hawkinge register also indicates a date of christening as having been 3 Dec 1620. | ROOME, Anne ✝ (I14766)
|
| 4388 |
This child mentioned in Will of John Milsted of Pluckley, 1629. | HOPPER, Thomas (I4877)
|
| 4389 |
This child was baptised on the same day and in the same church as Charles William Poulsom the son of Thomas Poulsom and Susannah (nee Salter). | POULSOM, Sarah (I1749)
|
| 4390 |
This child was baptised on the same day and in the same church as Eleanor Poulsom the daughter of Thomas Poulsom and Susannah (nee Salter). | POULSOM, Elizabeth (I1750)
|
| 4391 |
This child was baptised on the same day and in the same church as Elizabeth Poulsom, the daughter of James Poulsom and Ann. | POULSOM, Eleanor (I1068)
|
| 4392 |
This child was baptised on the same day and in the same church as Sarah Poulsom, the daughter of James Poulsom and Ann. | POULSOM, Charles William (I1066)
|
| 4393 |
This child was christened with a sister but the page is heavily damaged and her name is illegible. | AUSTIN, John (I6530)
|
| 4394 |
This child was still living as of 21 January 1589/90 as reference is made to his father in terms of the father being William Ruck Senior in the grant of administration of his goods. | RUCK, William (I6257)
|
| 4395 |
This connection is purely supposition but the date of 1595 fits with the purported marriage of this Thomas for the births of this 3 children.
02 Feb 1595 Thomas Rucke & Sara Jonson
Collection: Kent: Canterbury - St. Dunstan - Christenings, Marriages and Burialls, 1559-1800 (Baptism) | Family (F1447)
|
| 4396 |
THIS COUPLE NOT IN BLISLAND IN 1807 OR 1809
Hosken Richard c 19 Sep 1802 Arthur/Grace Egloshayle PR
no events at Egloshayle for John/Mary Hoskin at any time after marriage in 1801 at Blisland. So where were they between 1801 and 1807 when they turn up in Linkinhorne?
***no events for John/Mary Hoskin at Blisland after their marriage in 1801. Also need to check Blisland after 1812.
South Hill - searched 1801-1818 = nothing of significance
North Hill- searched 1801-1818 = nothing
St. Ive -early years very damaged and missing there are some Hoskin entries mid to later 1700s - no early 1800s pages at all searched from 1813+ - found a marriage of a John Hoskin widower to Phillipa Bartlett in 1833 - check for this couple on 1841 census
Lezant - only a John/Mary nee Bennet Hocking 1799 through 1820
St. Mabyn - Hawken and Hocken - see transcripts
Helland - one 1 - Hawken Mary c 25 May 1806 Henry/Elizabeth
Bodmin - see transcripts
St. Neot - see transcripts
St. Cleer
StokeClimsland
Lewannick
Altarnun
St. Breward
South Petherwin
Lawhitton
Warleggan
Cardinham
Hoskin Philippa c 18 Jun 1809 William/Mary Blisland PR
Hoskin Richard c 14 Jun 1812 William/Mary Blisland
Hoskin William c 8 Apr 1804 William/Mary Blisland
Hoskin Dorothy c 11 May 1806 William/Mary Blisland
Hoskin Elizabeth c 9 May 1802 William/Mary Blisland
Hoskin Arthur c 18 Nov 1798 William/Mary Blisland
Hoskin Mary c 25 Sep 1796 William/Mary Blisland
Hoskin Ann c 27 Sep 1812 Thomas/Dinah Bllisland
Hoskyn Thomas c 27 Jul 1788 Thomas/Ann
Hoskin Elizabeth c 7 Oct 1781 Thomas/Ann
Hoskin Andrew c 18 Apr 1784 Thomas/Ann
Hoskin William c 15 Aug 1784 Nicholas/Elizabeth Blisland
Hoskin Susanna c 11 Apr 1773 Henry/Elizabeth
***Hoskin John c 28 Sep 1777 Henry/Elizabeth
Hoskin Dorothy c 2 Aug 1767 Thomas/Mary
Hoskin Elizabeth c 9 Aug 1767 Henry/Elizabeth
Hawken John c 6 Dec 1767 John/Jane
Hoskin Mary c 7 Sep 1770 base child of Elizabeth
Hosking Margaret c 19 Sep 1770 Henry/Elizabeth
Hoskin William c 4 Nov 1770 Arthur/Elizabeth
Hoskin Joan c 25 Dec 1770 Thomas/Mary
Hoskin Mary c 30 May 1762 Henry/Catherine
Hoskin Mary c 6 Jun 1762 Thomas/Mary
Hoskin Henry c 16 Jul 1764 Henry/Elizabeth
Hoskin Elizabeth c 31 Mar 1765 Thomas/Elizabeth
Hoskin William c 8 Jan 1758 John/Dorothy
Hoskin John c 21 May 1758 Thomas/Mary
Hoskin Jane c 11 Jun 1758 Henry/Catherine
Hoskin Philippa c 15 Mar 1759 William/Elizabeth
Hoskin Mary c 12 Aug 1759 Henry/Elizabeth
Hoskin Henry c 28 Sep 1760 Henry/Catherine
Hoskin Dorothy c 13 Sep 1761 William/Elizabeth
Hoskin Joan c 31 Jan 1762 Henry/Elizabeth
Hoskyn Andrew c 9 Dec 1753 Edy/Elizabeth
Hoskyn Charles c 3 Feb 1754 William/Elizabeth
Hoskyn Henry c 19 Dec 1755 Thomas/Mary
Hoskyn John c 5 Sep 1756 Henry/Catharine
Hoskyn Thomas c 25 Sep 1757 Edy/Elizabeth
Hoskyn John c 19 Mar 1748 John/Dorothy
Hoskyn Elizabeth c 19 Nov 1749 Edy/Elizabeth
Hoskyn Mary c 2 Jun 1751 William/Elizabeth
Hoskyn Mary c 29 Mar 1752 Edy/Elizabeth
Hoskyn Dorothy c 17 May 1752 John/Dorothy
Hocken Richard c 8 Aug 1742 Pierce/Willimot
Hoskyn Mary c 5 Feb 1743 John/Dorothy
Hoskyn Arthur c 11 Mar 1743 Edy/Elizabeth
Hocken John c 1 Jul 1744 Pearce/Willimot
Hoskyn Joan c 30 Jan 1746 William/Elizabeth
Hoskyn Richard c 29 jun 1746 John/Dorothy
Hocken Willimott c 15 Sep 1746 Pearce/Willimott
Hoskyn Arthur c 1 Mar 1747 Edy/Elizabeth
Hoskyn Elizabeth c 5 Apr 1747 William/Elizabeth
Hawken Thomas c 24 Jun 1735 William/Mary
Hawken Mary c 5 Mar 1738 William/Mary
Hoskyn Henry c 24 May 1730 William/Joan
Hoskin Henry c 19 Feb 1733 Henry/Dorothy
Hoskin Mary c 20 Nov 1726 John/Joan
Hoskyn Thomas c 30 Jul 1727 Henry/Dorothy
Hoskyn William c 22 May 1720 John/Joan
Hoskyn John c 14 May 1721 Henry/Dorothy
Hoskyn Edy c 25 Feb 1722 s/o John/Joan
Hocken Elizabeth c 3 Mar 1722 Abedney/Joan
Hocker Catharine c 10 Sep 1723 Abednego/Joan
Hoskyn Elizabeth c 6 Nov 1723 Henry/Dorothy
Hoskyn Arthur c 26 Jul 1724 John/Joan
Hoskin John c 11 Sep 1716 John/Joan
Hoskin Margery c 3 Jun 1718 Richard/Margery
At Linkinhorne:
Hoskin Mary Ann c 21 Jun 1807 John/Mary Linkinhorne PR
Hoskin James c 26 Mar 1809 John/Mary Linkinhorne
Hoskyns Elizabeth dbl 22 Aug 1814 residing at Horra Bridge, Linkinhorne, about 95 years
Hoskin Dinah dbl 12 Aug 1823 residing Willanmill, aged 4 years
Hoskin Johannah dbl 16 Apr 1833 residing at Henwood, aged 3 years
Hoskin Elizabeth dbl 28 Jun 1835 residing at Henwood, 33 years
Hosking Mary dbl 24 Apr 1842 residing at Stoke, aged 1 year
Hocking John dbl 7 May 1850 residing at Lauceston, aged 51 years
Hocking Mary dbl 21 Nov 1852 residing at Tufirge Mill, aged 96 years
Hoskin John Soper Elizabeth Harvey m 26 Feb 1824 he bachelor of this parish, she spinster, sojourner of this parish - banns, he signed by mark, witnesses Gregory Soper, Edward Hosking?
==================================================================================
John Hoskin
1777-1846
BIRTH 28 SEP 1777 • Blisland Cornwall
Birth of Daughter Elizabeth Hoskin(1802-)
08 Aug 1802 • Lostwithiel Cornwall
Birth of Son William Hoskin(1804-)
24 Jun 1804 • Lostwithiel Cornwall | HOSKING, John (I18940)
|
| 4397 |
This couple not married. | Family (F39)
|
| 4398 |
This couple not married. | Family (F40)
|
| 4399 |
This date is based on the date of probate of the nuncupative Will of William Austin of Chilham proved 25 May 1631. | Family (F1752)
|
| 4400 |
This date is correct and she was baptised with her cousin, John William Smith Baker son of Eli and Charity Baker. | SMITH, Edith (I620)
|
|
|
|
